Abercrombie & Fitch and Old Navy

Give me something for George Bush, and certainly not as his father and Ronald Reagan, he seems to have little idea of what he is doing or why.
This week's concession Sharon is unusual. You may think, in common everything from the White House these days, which is with the coming election, he wants to increase their share of the jews, particularly important to vote in Florida. But doesn't he know about possible disastrous effects? No one told him?
Do you think and Reagan, and he doesn't attentional processing complex decisions, the people around him know what they want, and delivery. Like the statue of liberty, everyone knows he stood, because without him, need to speak. But Mr Bush seemed to put round like a cork in tide.
He is considered to be low tax and lower consumer spending. But spending continues to soar. With grotesque new national highway bill, just pass the house of representatives.
This includes funding for two bridges in Alaska. One, according to the New York Times, will link the small town of Ketchikan to an island with just 50 residents - and a small airstrip. It will be 24 metres (80ft) taller than the Brooklyn Bridge, and will cost $200m (£112m).
The other bridge would span two miles of sea from Anchorage to a port that has one regular tenant and virtually no homes or businesses. That will cost $2bn. In that vast country, each household will have to stump up around $20 for these pointless structures.
Because no young, Alaska as the only representative of indoors, chair the vastly powerful transportation and infrastructure committee.
This bridge? B probably. Bush seems unwilling or unable to stop them.
Our own humber bridge is cynical political stunt, designed to help win 1966 hull north byelection, but it is compared, children playing these boondoggles meccano.
· meaningless but funny joke, quantity 873 in series:
"Doctor, doctor, I keep thinking I'm moth!"
"You don't need a doctor, you need a mental doctor."
"I know, but your lights on."
· I came back from America to find my countrymen excited about claim around David Beckham's extracurricular love life, and Britain's decline in Germany spiegel animadversions by German ambassador's brother.
In fact I think the first one has proved the second truth. Why do we only Beckham? Why do we, or some of us, anyway -- seem to feel if requested is not good, he cheated his wife, but we. He has revealed the national trust? What is wrong, we need this and we re - assurance?
I always think Beckham as a kind of essence comic figure. I know he is an excellent player, but in some extent, can be fully lets everybody is really cool.
There's the whiny voice (how wise he always was to give few television interviews!) There are the girly clothes: not bold attempts to reset the boundaries of gender, as some of the more excitable commentators suggest, but just silly.
Or the time he was brought on by Sir Alex Ferguson at a crucial moment in a European game and scored a dazzling goal while wearing an Alice band.
As for the fact that he might have had sex with other women, President of news test, I sometimes ask why Angus Deayton have received using 50,000 performing I have something to tell you, if you want to spend cocaine and champagne - fuelled evening using 1000 prostitutes in luxury hotel suites, and I always answered: "because he can."
The same problem, why a more affluent player wants to faithful to his beautiful wife?
I saw the marks and spencer is decreasing once again. This is a kind of running story, like failure of England cricket team. Once again, things get better, but this is usually a false hope.
I like mark clothes, then I'll ignorance clothes. I do know, sometimes almost impossible to buy things. In our branch office, away from food section, you can spend an age blunt round just want to find someone who will put your money to buy a pair of socks. Ta seems to be a good person, this leads to the mercy of the lady, they look as if they would be happy to make you a cup of tea, just didn't have time to go behind the cash register.
In the States last week, I was commissioned by my children to buy clothes - at ludicrously low prices - from two stores, Abercrombie & Fitch and Old Navy. The offspring had carefully got internet printouts of what they wanted