Friday, December 3, 2010

Even less subtle was Tom Ford's Yves Saint Laurent advert

Only a few weeks ago julianne Moore found himself shame at our fashion graveyard lost her bulgari advertising campaign. Now the very same advertising -- whether a naked and naked lion frolicking julianne (they) no shame? - has been banned from saint mark's square in Venice. "Ads displayed naked women grotto inappropriate mark's square to the mayor said," Orsoni ·, causing the FS thinking whether nudity or furniture he opposed.
In fact, ads off the dullest or shocking in recent days, and sex imaging bare fashion should for Germany. Once they used delicate sex advice, they now with a hammer, and ironic extremely expensive clothes sold don't wear seems to have no a troubling them work is not satisfied.
The list of advertising is long and does not prohibit remote brilliant. Sophia dahl opium advertising, pictured above, is one of the most complained advertisements the asa history and was banned from UK advertising leaflet. In 2001, a French connection advertising has a beautiful young couple of their intimate very complete prohibition advertising watchdog said they were astonished creators "even should give text".
 Then there was the Elle Macpherson underwear ad, deemed too controversial for appearing to be taken by a peeping tom, despite the creators insisting it was just arty. Well of course. When is shooting a girl in her underwear through a keyhole not arty? Even less subtle was Tom Ford's Yves Saint Laurent advert [warning: not safe for work viewing] which used full frontal male nudity to sell aftershave. "Perfume is worn on the skin, so why hide the body?" said Ford, with the kind of perverse logic that probably featured in the creation of this oh-so-subtle image for Sisley.

No comments:

Post a Comment